Through this Sacrament, in a miraculous and supernatural way, Jesus is giving me—yes, me, a lost and condemned sinner who struggles daily with the temptations of Satan and the guilt of my sins and the desires of my flesh and the pressures of this sinful world—his very body and blood for the forgiveness of my sins.
This is the eighth article in a part series on key doctrinal emphases that Luther brought back to light through his Reformation. Find this article and answers online after May 5. Use our online form to share it to our editorial office for consideration.
Get inspirational stories, spiritual help, and synod news from Forward in Christ every month. Print and digital subscriptions are available from Northwestern Publishing House. Author: Joel D. Otto Volume , Number 5 Issue: May Images may not be reproduced except in the context of its article. Contact us. Statement of Beliefs. By accepting this message, you consent to our cookies on this device in accordance with our cookie policy found in the WELS Privacy Policy , unless you have disabled them.
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features. Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain. Luther writes, "If I could by any means comprehend [i.
It is in Christ that the mysterious God is most visible and the incomprehensible God is most revealed , without abandoning God's mystery. The knowledge of God revealed in Christ is the beginning of all true knowledge of God and humanity.
Luther tells believers not to contemplate the mystery of God but to look to "God incarnate. Rather, Christ is clothed in the flesh and points the believer towards the word of God's promises that is the gospel of Jesus Christ. Christ has opened our minds so that we may understand the Scriptures [Luke ], and the gospel is preached to the whole creation [Mark ].
Therefore, Luther takes no credit for the Reformation but attributes it all to the word of God:. Thus the person of Jesus Christ is the only way of articulating the worth of Christianity. It is Christ who forms the new person who is open to God's word. Luther writes, "I do not live in my own person, but Christ lives within me. To be sure, I live as a person, but not in myself or for my own person. Through the gospel of Jesus Christ Luther is able to overcome the self-deception of works-righteousness that can only foster "anxious doubt," and finally, in a very personal way, discover the liberation and freedom only available in the faithful assurance that God necessarily keeps God's promises.
Faith requires complete trust in God precisely because there is no direct knowledge of God for humanity. Even Christ and His Word constitute a form of indirect revelation or faith in things not seen.
And, even more importantly, Christ on the cross is not directly visible as the victor over hell, death, and the devil. In order to make room for faith, Luther writes,. The hidden God of the theology of the cross is none other than the crucified God, and therefore a manifestation of the revealed God. There is no place for Christian metaphysical rationality at the fact of the cross of Christ. For Luther, the cross makes demands on Christian response that must either be acted on or ignored. If Christian thought ignores the demands of the cross it becomes a theology of glory.
A theology of glory is rooted in religious speculation and contemplation that results in a sentimental theology. If the cross becomes the foundation of Christian thought, a theology of the cross results. It is distinguished from the theology of glory precisely because it leads a believer out of his or her speculative glaze and propels one into the decision of faith. Faith becomes a personal decision and the existential test of faith becomes the cross of Jesus Christ.
Luther writes,. The doctrine of the cross, which decisively determines Luther's concept of God and faith, can be understood only in a life under the cross. Luther writes, "Through the cross works are dethroned and [the old] Adam, who is especially edified by works, is crucified.
The Christian life of faith is therefore a life of suffering and conflict; one experiences the assaults of the devil, the famous Anfechtungen that troubled Luther all his life. The meaning of the cross cannot disclose itself in speculative thought, but only in suffering experience.
The revealed yet hidden God found, most distinctively, in the incarnation and at the cross of Christ. In the incarnation and cross of Christ God acts in ways precisely opposite to humanity's common expectations of God and thus calls forth a response of faith.
It is in the cross that Luther locates the certainty of salvation and eternal life. The gospel, according to Luther, "is nothing but the preaching about Christ.
The revealed God is unconditional salvic will. The gospel is the good news of the healing and saving God. For some people the preaching of the gospel merely hardens their hearts and makes them detest God all the more. Luther's doctrine of God's predestination seems to contradict the mercy of the revealed God. Luther writes, "God's eternal predestination-out of which originally proceeds who shall believe or not, who can or cannot get rid of sin-in order that our salvation may be taken entirely out of our hands and put in the hand of God alone.
Luther writes, "God does many things that he does not disclose to us in his word; he also wills many things which he does not disclose himself as willing in his word. Thus he does not will the death of a sinner according to his word; but he wills it according to that inscrutablewill of his. God's supreme attribute is God's freedom. Luther is clear that God is not bound by the revealed gospel when he writes: ".
God has not bound himself by his word, but has kept himself free over all things. It is here that the true believer has no recourse but must blindly have faith in God. God does not have to keep God's promises, but God will keep God's promises. This is at the heart of Luther's pure doctrine of faith. Luther writes:. One cannot logically affirm of the one what applies to the other. The two concepts appear to be diametrically opposed to one another; almost as if there is more than one God.
Can the unity of the Godhead be maintained in the midst of such contrary statements? Erasmus asks this question in another way: Is it conceivable that the God who weeps over the death of his people causes this very death? Erasmus argues that if humans do not possess freedom of will then it is impossible for them to be responsible for their sins. If God predetermines human sin, then God, and not humanity, is responsible for the origination of human sin.
Consequentially God is the cause of the sinner's death. This is how Erasmus poses the problem and solves it by having recourse to his view of free will.
Erasmus sought to make God calculable to human reason, but reason cannot cope with the paradox of evil in the world. Erasmus does not take into account the hidden God with which humans can have no dealings.
Reason seeks an earthly answer to a heavenly concern. Luther argues that humans must be guided "by the word and not by that inscrutable will. Clearly, Luther does not mean to assert that the will of God and the revealed will of Christ are distinct from one another. Although logical contradictions are evident, Luther nevertheless forcefully states, "that there is no other God than this man Jesus Christ. Pure faith is willing to accept that secrets remain hidden behind the revealed God while reason can only establish a dualism.
God is both revealed and hidden in Christ. The believer should"fear and adore" 64 the hidden God. It is in line with Luther's understanding of the hiddenness of God in Christ, when he affirms that God "hides his eternal goodness and mercy under eternal wrath, his righteousness under iniquity.
Luther cannot and does not give a definitive answer to this question. Humans are not competent to judge or explain why one person is granted salvation and another person is not. It is nearly unbearable to see how the omnipotent God can be righteous and good, let alone merciful, when God "saves so few and damns somany;" 67 but through faith and his interpretation of the Bible Luther maintains that God is somehow good and righteous.
Faith in the assertion of God's goodness is absolutely necessary for Luther. At the end of his treatise on The Bondage of the Will , Luther admits that in the light of nature the rationality of fallen humanity such an assertion is absurd, but in the light of grace the revelation of God in Christ the assertion is believable but not demonstrable; and in the light of glory God's perfected Kingdom in the eternal life beyond this life people shall discover the unquestionable truth of what on earth people can only believe.
Implications for Christian Ethics [35] Perhaps one of the greatest legacies of Luther's theology is that he did not try to provide a formal systematic theology complete with all the answers. Luther believes that a totally rationalized Christianity is a Christianity that ultimately leads to atheism or skepticism.
A rational Christianity would no longer require grace and faith in a transcendent God acting in the world. There is no space for free will in Luther's theology because the human will is held in complete bondage to either God or Satan. Erasmus' mitigated skepticism places too much emphasis on human faculties. But for Luther skepticism is unthinkable: Without the certainty that God knows all things, not contingently, but necessarily, Christians will soon stop trusting in God's promises and then all faith will be lost and the gospel reduced to a mockery.
Luther's theology is rooted in a pure doctrine of faith that must always be distinct from any contingent notion of works-righteousness or self-righteousness.
For Luther, Christian liberty is not a human achievement but a gift of God's grace. But it is an empowering gift because it frees Christians from their obsession with themselves and their own salvation in order to act for the real needs of their neighbor without concern for personal reward or punishment. A pure doctrine of faith frees the Christian from selfish concerns so that he or she can be purely concerned with the love of God and the love of neighbor. End Notes. The topic occupied many of his sermons, tracts, and theological treatises throughout his career.
Throughout the later Middle Ages and up until the sixteenth century, the Roman Catholic doctrine of the Mass was the received view in the Western church. The doctrine of transubstantiation asserts that when the priest says the words of consecration, the substance of the bread and wine is transformed into the substance of the body and blood of Christ. The accidens that is, the incidental properties of the bread and wine remain the same.
Rome also teaches that the Eucharist is a propitiatory sacrifice; in fact, the same sacrifice Christ offered on the cross. The Eucharistic sacrifice is offered for the sins of the living and the dead.
He offered a different explanation for the presence of Christ. In order to understand his view, however, a brief explanation of some rather obscure theological terminology is required. Medieval scholastic theologians had distinguished various modes of presence, or ways of being present.
They used the term local presence to describe the way in which physical, finite things are present in a circumscribed place. Spiritual presence described the way in which spiritual beings such as angels, souls, or God are present. Because this term was somewhat vague, other terms were used in order to be more specific. Illocal presence , for example, described the way in which finite spiritual beings for example, human souls or angels are present, while repletive presence described the way in which an infinite spiritual being God is present.
He continued to progressively clarify and explain his doctrine of the Supper over the next two decades. The sacraments, according to Calvin, are inseparably attached to the Word.
0コメント